MENU LOGIN 
   Redirecting... ...to our OLD website!


We're still in the process of converting the site to the new format.

Apologies for the inconvenience and thank you for your understanding.

-Matt, Admin

5

Ok - go now to OLD site

No thanks - stay on NEW site


BM Website Issues/Help Requests

Forum error just now

Forum error just now - Forums [Biker Match] Forum error just now - Forums [Biker Match]
Home / Search Forums / BM Website Issues/Help Requests /

Forum error just now

 Posts: 26       Pages: 1/2

Post Reply
Yea i know i know. dammit i really need to build that test server lol

   Update Reply
Matt @ 07/07/2009 20:40  

.. and have that bath!!!

   Update Reply
TeeCee @ 07/07/2009 20:43  

and get some work done!!

   Update Reply
Karey @ 07/07/2009 20:43  

lol ok im gonna make a big change to the site now to try and stop people double-clicking things and running up the server processing time (if a page doesn't load in 2 seconds, people start clicking the links over and over again which just generates more work for the server). Let me know if you find any errors around the site.

   Update Reply
Matt @ 07/07/2009 20:46  

Was that this one?

Response object error 'ASP 0156 : 80004005' Header Error /sites/bm/myaccount/login.asp, line 119 The HTTP headers are already written to the client browser. Any HTTP header modifications must be made before writing page content.

Trying to log in while open on the voting thread just now :o)


   Update Reply
Wannabe @ 07/07/2009 20:48  

Sorry about the white text - won't let me edit it - comes up with the error again

   Update Reply
Wannabe @ 07/07/2009 20:49  

yes WB, but are you getting that NOW?

   Update Reply
Matt @ 07/07/2009 20:54  

Matt - just sent you a pm - re an error I just got writing a PM

   Update Reply
Holmfirthgirl @ 07/07/2009 20:56  

ah dammit, yea thats happening now. Ok i'll have to revert back and put my thinking cap on again. (Reason: Can't flush the ASP buffer if i need to set cookies lol)

   Update Reply
Matt @ 07/07/2009 20:56  

Ian is trying to email you the errors & cannot do so .... as it gives him another error... same one that wanna is getting but with newpm.asp line 170 as the source

   Update Reply
Deleted User @ 07/07/2009 20:57  

tthanks shell, ive put the code back as it was now so it should be fine. line 170 helps, thanks

   Update Reply
Matt @ 07/07/2009 20:59  

Also on that page, with the error showing, there was the error notification at the bottom left of the page... Here's the info from that too... Webpage error details User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.0; Trident/4.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729)Timestamp: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 19:58:48 UTC Message: Object expectedLine: 95Char: 1Code: 0URI: http://www.bikermatch.co.uk/sites/b...%3F

   Update Reply
Bandit_Mr_P @ 07/07/2009 21:00  

I didn't break it this time! ner ner

   Update Reply
Sandi @ 07/07/2009 21:01  

Strange one that ... Ian was emailing Matt & getting the error... but they still showing as sent PM's

   Update Reply
Deleted User @ 07/07/2009 21:04  

Mr P ur just showing off now lol. Ok ok i screwed up. Will build the test box at weekend

   Update Reply
Matt @ 07/07/2009 21:06  

shell, that's because the data was added to the database but the FORWARDING back to the inbox page was prevented (due to the change i made). Technically speaking... the response buffer was flushed prevented a response redirect

   Update Reply
Matt @ 07/07/2009 21:07  

Test? Mm I dunt like t'sound o' that lol

   Update Reply
Sandi @ 07/07/2009 21:08  

Matt - also - have received a PM - but not the e-mail notification that usually comes with it.

   Update Reply
Holmfirthgirl @ 07/07/2009 21:16  

When I'm doing a test, I throw another web site together on a different port... but alas, with SQL behind it, it's not that easy is it Matt... Assuming you "include" your DB information in your ASP, so only the "include" target needs changing, could you have a different SQL Instance (i.e. a named one) and a different port (500 for example), which would mean you didn't need more hardware, or is hardware not an issue? *** Wanders off in a haze of geekiness... ***

   Update Reply
Bandit_Mr_P @ 07/07/2009 21:17  

HFG - Yup... Shell recieved a notification 30 minutes after the PM!

   Update Reply
Bandit_Mr_P @ 07/07/2009 21:18  

 Posts: 26       Pages: 1/2

Back to top
Facebook Twitter Google Pinterest Text Email