lol ok im gonna make a big change to the site now to try and stop people double-clicking things and running up the server processing time (if a page doesn't load in 2 seconds, people start clicking the links over and over again which just generates more work for the server).
Let me know if you find any errors around the site.
Response object error 'ASP 0156 : 80004005'
Header Error
/sites/bm/myaccount/login.asp, line 119
The HTTP headers are already written to the
client browser. Any HTTP header modifications must be made before
writing page content.
Trying to log in while open on the voting thread just now :o)
ah dammit, yea thats happening now.
Ok i'll have to revert back and put my thinking cap on again.
(Reason: Can't flush the ASP buffer if i need to set cookies lol)
Ian is trying to email you the errors & cannot do so .... as it gives him another error... same one that wanna is getting but with newpm.asp line 170 as the source
Also on that page, with the error showing, there was the error notification at the bottom left of the page...
Here's the info from that too...
Webpage error details
User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.0; Trident/4.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729)Timestamp: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 19:58:48 UTC
Message: Object expectedLine: 95Char: 1Code: 0URI: http://www.bikermatch.co.uk/sites/b...%3F
shell, that's because the data was added to the database but the FORWARDING back to the inbox page was prevented (due to the change i made).
Technically speaking... the response buffer was flushed prevented a response redirect
When I'm doing a test, I throw another web site together on a different port... but alas, with SQL behind it, it's not that easy is it Matt...
Assuming you "include" your DB information in your ASP, so only the "include" target needs changing, could you have a different SQL Instance (i.e. a named one) and a different port (500 for example), which would mean you didn't need more hardware, or is hardware not an issue?
*** Wanders off in a haze of geekiness... ***